Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether immovable properties standing in the name of the deceased assessee's wife could be attached for recovery of excise dues, and whether the department was required to verify the source of acquisition of those properties before proceeding with attachment.
Analysis: The duty liability confirmed against the deceased assessee had attained finality, and the department was entitled to proceed against property belonging to the deceased and, where applicable, property inherited by legal heirs. However, the personal property of the legal heir could not be proceeded against merely because the husband had unpaid dues. The decisive question was whether the four flats were acquired from the petitioner's own income or from the husband's resources. As the authorities had not examined this aspect, the matter required fresh consideration on the basis of the petitioner's representation and supporting material.
Conclusion: The attachment could not be sustained without first determining whether the properties were acquired from the petitioner's own source of income. The Commissioner was directed to examine the material, pass a speaking order, and lift the attachment if the properties were found to be self-acquired by the petitioner.