Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether late fee under section 70 of the Finance Act, 1994 could be sustained when the assessee had paid the short-paid service tax with interest before issuance of show cause notice and was held entitled to the benefit of section 73(3) of the Finance Act, 1994.
Analysis: The assessee had detected the short payment during investigation, discharged the service tax liability with interest before issuance of the notice, and informed the department. Once section 73(3) was held applicable, the statutory scheme treated the pre-notice payment as sufficient to obviate issuance of a notice for the amount so paid. In that situation, the imposition of late fee under section 70, read with Rule 7C of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, could not survive.
Conclusion: The late fee demand under section 70 of the Finance Act, 1994 was wrongly imposed and was set aside in favour of the assessee.