Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether service tax demand could be sustained against the appellant for goods transport agency services when the tax on the same transportation amount had already been paid by the service provider, so as to avoid double taxation.
Analysis: The appellant was contesting only the balance demand, while the records showed that the goods transport agency had already deposited the tax along with interest in respect of the same amount. The CBEC clarification stated that if service tax due on transportation of a consignment has been paid or is payable by the person liable to pay it, the same amount should not again be charged from any other person. On these facts, the demand against the appellant would result in double taxation and could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The demand was unsustainable and was set aside; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.