Share transaction characterisation as business income upheld on frequency, volume, holding period and profit motive

Extensive and repetitive share dealings involving high volume, short holding periods, intraday transactions and repeated scrip trading showed an organised trading pattern rather than passive investment. On the totality of facts, including frequency, turnover, holding period and profit motive, the receipts were characterised as business income instead of short-term capital gain. The limited dividend yield relative to the investment base also supported the trading inference. The assessee's challenge failed, and the income was correctly assessed as business income.

---

---

Issues: Whether the short-term capital gain arising from the assessee's share transactions was rightly assessed as business income.

Analysis: The assessee had entered into extensive and repetitive share transactions involving large volume, high turnover, short holding periods, intraday dealings, and repeated purchase and sale of the same scrips. The pattern of dealings, together with the limited dividend yield in relation to the investment base, indicated an organised trading activity rather than passive investment. The earlier order in the assessee's own case for an earlier assessment year had already examined the same character of transactions, and the factual pattern in the relevant year was even more intense. The rule that the character of share transactions must be determined on the totality of facts, including frequency, volume, holding period and profit motive, supported classification as trading income.

Conclusion: The short-term capital gain was correctly treated as business income, and the assessee's challenge failed.

---