Tribunal remits commission issue, upholds disallowances on stamp duty & interest payment.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding the cost of acquisition but remitted the issue of commission for selling the property back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The disallowances of stamp duty expenses and interest payment claimed as compensation were upheld. The appeal was partly allowed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of commission paid for acquiring property.
2. Disallowance of commission paid for selling property.
3. Disallowance of stamp duty expenses.
4. Disallowance of interest payment claimed as compensation.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance of Commission Paid for Acquiring Property:
The assessee claimed the commission paid for acquiring two properties as part of the cost of acquisition. The Assessing Officer (A.O.) disallowed Rs. 5 lakhs for each property and Rs. 30,000/- salary paid to the watchman, reducing the cost of acquisition. The CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance, stating that the properties were purchased from Visakhapatnam Cooperative House Building Society, where no intermediaries were involved. The assessee argued that the commission was paid for services rendered in facilitating the purchase process. The Tribunal noted that the cost of acquisition, including the commission, was declared in the balance sheet for FY 2006-07 and accepted in the assessment year 2007-08. The Tribunal held that revisiting the issue was not justified and directed the A.O. to allow the cost of acquisition as declared by the assessee.

2. Disallowance of Commission Paid for Selling Property:
The assessee claimed Rs. 12 lakhs as commission for selling the properties but failed to furnish confirmation from the recipients. The A.O. disallowed the commission due to lack of evidence. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, noting that the assessee did not prove the genuineness of the payment. The Tribunal observed that the addresses of the recipients were provided, and the A.O. should have verified the genuineness of the payments. The Tribunal remitted the matter back to the A.O. for fresh consideration and necessary enquiries, directing the A.O. to provide a reasonable opportunity to the assessee.

3. Disallowance of Stamp Duty Expenses:
The assessee claimed stamp duty expenses of Rs. 13,42,785/- and Rs. 13,32,575/- for two properties, arguing that these were borne by the vendor due to litigation and tenant issues. The A.O. disallowed the expenses, stating they should be borne by the buyer. The CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance, highlighting that the expenses reduce the consideration received by the seller and violate Section 50C of the Act. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)’s order, noting that stamp duty and registration charges are not considered expenses related to the transfer of property in the hands of the transferor.

4. Disallowance of Interest Payment Claimed as Compensation:
The assessee claimed Rs. 6 lakhs as interest paid to M/s. VPL Projects for cancellation of a sale agreement. The A.O. disallowed the claim due to lack of proper evidence. The CIT(A) confirmed the addition, noting no nexus between the payment and the sale of the impugned property. The Tribunal observed that the compensation was not related to acquiring the property and was instead linked to the sale of agricultural land. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)’s order, stating that the compensation was not a direct expense related to the transfer of property and thus not allowable under the head Capital Gains.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding the cost of acquisition but remitted the issue of commission for selling the property back to the A.O. for fresh consideration. The disallowances of stamp duty expenses and interest payment claimed as compensation were upheld. The appeal was partly allowed.

---