Tribunal rules in favor of assessee on all counts, allowing depreciation and rejecting disallowance under section 14A.

The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on all counts in the case. It allowed depreciation on leased out assets, citing consistency with a previous decision and various circumstances supporting the allowance. Additionally, it held that broken period interest should not be considered part of the cost of securities based on precedent, directing the deletion of the addition. Regarding the disallowance under section 14A r.w.r 8D, the Tribunal found the AO's lack of satisfaction in rejecting the assessee's claim, leading to the deletion of the disallowed expenses and ultimately dismissing the revenue's appeal.

---

---

Issues:
1. Depreciation on leased out assets.
2. Holding of broken period interest as not part of the cost of securities.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Depreciation on leased out assets:
The first issue in this case pertains to the allowance of depreciation on leased out assets when the related transactions were considered purely financial transactions. The Tribunal referred to a previous decision in the assessee's own case and held that the issue stands covered in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal noted that the earlier decision allowed depreciation under various circumstances, including sale-leaseback transactions, genuineness of transactions, and assets being put to use. The Tribunal maintained consistency with the earlier year's decision and dismissed the revenue's appeal on this ground.

2. Holding of broken period interest:
The second issue raised by the revenue was regarding the treatment of broken period interest as not part of the cost of securities and whether it should be allowed as a deduction. The Tribunal again referred to a decision in the assessee's own case and held that the issue was covered in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal cited a judgment of the jurisdictional High Court and directed the AO to delete the addition based on the precedent set by the High Court. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the ground raised by the assessee and dismissed the appeal of the revenue.

3. Disallowance under section 14A r.w.r 8D:
The final issue involved the disallowance of expenses under section 14A read with rule 8D of the Act and Rules. The AO had disallowed a specific amount as expenses related to earning exempt income, which was upheld by the CIT(A). However, the Tribunal found that the AO had not recorded satisfaction as to why the claim of the assessee was incorrect, as required by law. Relying on a decision of the High Court, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and directed the AO to delete the addition. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, while the appeal of the revenue was dismissed.

In conclusion, the Tribunal's judgment addressed various issues related to depreciation on leased out assets, treatment of broken period interest, and disallowance under section 14A r.w.r 8D, providing detailed analysis and legal reasoning for each issue, ultimately deciding in favor of the assessee on all counts.

---