Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to full waiver of pre-deposit of service tax, interest and penalty in respect of the demand arising from inclusion of free-of-cost facilities and reimbursed infrastructure charges in the taxable value.
Analysis: One view held that the free supply of office space, infrastructure and staff welfare facilities, as well as reimbursed charges for seats and allied infrastructure, constituted non-monetary consideration having a direct nexus with the taxable service and were prima facie includible in the value of service under the valuation provisions. On that basis, complete waiver was declined and a partial pre-deposit was directed. The other view accepted the appellant's plea for full waiver, treating the appellant as having made out a prima facie case for exclusion of the disputed amounts from the taxable value and for waiver of the entire pre-deposit during the pendency of the appeal. As there was a difference of opinion between the Members, the matter was directed to be placed before the Hon'ble President for reference to a third Member.
Conclusion: No final majority determination was reached on the waiver issue; the dispute was referred for resolution by a third Member.