Low tax effect bars departmental appeals where the monetary limit applies to pending matters as well.

Departmental appeals before CESTAT were held non-maintainable where the tax effect fell below the monetary limit prescribed by the applicable administrative instruction. The instruction was treated as applying to pending appeals as well, consistent with the cited High Court view and the Board's later clarification. As a result, the Tribunal declined to entertain the appeals on merits and dismissed them solely on the ground of low tax effect, without adjudicating the underlying dispute.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Revenue appeals were liable to be dismissed on the ground that the tax effect was below the monetary limit prescribed for filing appeals before the Tribunal.

Analysis: The appeals involved tax effect below the prescribed threshold under the applicable instruction fixing the monetary limit for departmental appeals. The instruction was treated as applicable to pending appeals as well, consistent with the view taken in the cited High Court decision and the subsequent clarification issued by the Board. In consequence, the appeals could not be entertained on merits.

Conclusion: The appeals were not maintainable in view of the monetary limit and were dismissed.

Final Conclusion: The departmental appeals stood rejected solely because the tax effect was below the prescribed limit, and no adjudication on the substantive dispute was undertaken.

Ratio Decidendi: A departmental appeal is not maintainable where the tax effect is below the monetary limit prescribed by the applicable administrative instruction, and such instruction applies to pending appeals also.

---