Tribunal upholds CIT (A)'s decision on interest, sets aside additional payments issue, and directs deletion of cash disallowance.

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal on the issue of interest on post-dated cheques, upholding the Ld. CIT (A)'s decision for re-computation based on a logical approach. The Tribunal set aside the issue of additional payments over the sale consideration for further verification by the AO to determine if any deduction was claimed. Regarding cash payments for land purchase under Section 40(A)(3), the Tribunal directed the AO to delete the disallowance as no expenses were claimed. Consequently, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeals of both parties.

---

---

Issues:
1. Interest on post-dated cheques
2. Additional payments made over sale consideration
3. Cash payments for land purchase invoking Section 40(A)(3) of the Income Tax Act

Detailed Analysis:
1. The issue of interest on post-dated cheques involved the Revenue challenging the order of the Ld. CIT (A) granting relief to the assessee. The Ld. CIT (A) directed the AO to re-compute the interest on post-dated cheques based on the extended period or after six months from the date of issue. The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT (A)'s decision citing a similar case precedent where the direction for re-calculation was found to be logical and based on seized material. Thus, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal on this issue.

2. Regarding the additional payments made over the sale consideration, the Tribunal found that there was no conclusive finding by the Ld. CIT (A) or the Assessing Officer on whether the payments were claimed as expenditure. The issue was remanded to the AO to verify if the deduction was claimed by the assessee, and only then the disallowance would be applicable. The Tribunal followed legal principles that disallowance does not arise when no expenditure is claimed. Hence, the Tribunal set aside this issue for further verification by the AO.

3. The issue of cash payments for land purchase invoking Section 40(A)(3) of the Act was challenged by the assessee, arguing that no expenses were claimed, thus disallowance should not apply. The Tribunal referred to precedents where it was held that when payments are not claimed as expenses, no disallowance arises. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the AO to delete the disallowance under Section 40(A)(3). Therefore, the Tribunal allowed the appeals of both the Revenue and the Assessee in part, with the findings on interest on post-dated cheques upheld, the issue of additional payments remanded for verification, and the disallowance under Section 40(A)(3) directed to be deleted.

---