Court grants interim relief to petitioners challenging order-in-original under Rule 8(3A) - Stay granted until June 30. The Court granted interim relief to the petitioners in a challenge to an order-in-original based on Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Citing ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Court grants interim relief to petitioners challenging order-in-original under Rule 8(3A) - Stay granted until June 30.
The Court granted interim relief to the petitioners in a challenge to an order-in-original based on Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Citing previous High Court decisions declaring Rule 8(3A) ultra vires the Constitution, the Court acknowledged a strong prima facie case in favor of the petitioners. Considering the balance of convenience, the Court ordered an interim stay on the order-in-original until June 30, 2017, or until further orders, whichever is earlier. The writ petition is scheduled for further consideration on June 6, 2017.
Issues involved: Challenge to order-in-original dated January 31, 2017 based on Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.
Analysis:
1. Validity of Rule 8(3A) under Constitution: The petitioners argue that Rule 8(3A) was considered by three different High Courts and found to be ultra vires the Constitution of India. They cite cases such as Indsur Global Ltd. v. Union of India, Malladi Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Union of India, Sandley Industries v. Union of India, and Shreeji Surface Coatings (P) Ltd. v. Union of India in support of their contention. The Special Leave Petition against Indsur Global Ltd. was admitted by the Supreme Court, which restrained the recovery of the assessed amount. The petitioners seek interim protection until the writ petition is disposed of.
2. Court's Consideration: The Court notes that the petitioner received a show cause notice under Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 in 2010, and had replied to it. Subsequently, three High Courts declared Rule 8(3A) as ultra vires the Constitution. However, the order-in-original dated January 31, 2017, was based on Rule 8(3A) without acknowledging the High Courts' decisions. The Court acknowledges the rulings in Indsur Global Ltd., Malladi Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Sandley Industries, and Shreeji Surface Coatings, which found Rule 8(3A) to be ultra vires Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.
3. Interim Relief: Considering the Supreme Court's restraint on recovery in a similar case, the Court finds a strong prima facie case in favor of the petitioner. The balance of convenience also favors granting relief. Consequently, the Court orders an interim stay on the order-in-original until June 30, 2017, or until further orders, whichever is earlier. The writ petition is listed for further consideration on June 6, 2017.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
TaxTMI 
