Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on duty-paid finished goods returned by purchasers for remaking, refining or reconditioning, and whether the assessee's records were sufficient to establish compliance with Rule 16.
Analysis: The returned goods were accompanied by duty-paying documents, the assessee accounted for receipt and subsequent clearance of the reprocessed goods in its records, and the materials on record showed that the goods were received back, reconditioned and cleared on payment of appropriate duty. In these circumstances, the statutory conditions for taking credit on returned goods were satisfied, and the denial of credit on the ground of alleged improper accounting was not justified.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the credit claimed, and the order denying the benefit was unsustainable.