Section 4A valuation for 25 kg packages required fresh examination of MRP, retail sale, and revenue-neutral limitation issues.

The Tribunal noted that the earlier remand directions had not been implemented in substance because no effective verification was made on whether 25 kg packages supplied to the dealer required MRP declaration or were sold in retail so as to attract Section 4A valuation. It also found that the evidence on return of the 25 kg packs, repacking into smaller packs, and duty payment on MRP-based clearances had not been properly examined, and the limitation issue was not considered from the standpoint of revenue neutrality. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner for fresh decision.

---

---

Issues: Whether the adjudicating authority had complied with the earlier remand directions and whether the matter required fresh consideration on the question of valuation of 25 kg packages under Section 4A and the related limitation aspect.

Analysis: The Tribunal found that the earlier directions had not been carried out in substance. No effective verification was made as to whether the 25 kg packages supplied to the dealer required declaration of MRP or whether they were ultimately sold in retail so as to attract Section 4A valuation. The evidence regarding return of the 25 kg packs, repacking into smaller packs, and duty payment on the MRP-based clearances was not properly examined. The limitation aspect was also not examined from the angle of revenue neutrality.

Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner for fresh decision.

---