Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment orders were liable to be set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration on the ground that no personal hearing was afforded and the petitioner was not given an effective opportunity to produce records and objections.
Analysis: The impugned reassessment proceedings were based on a discrepancy noticed between the monthly returns and the audited accounts. The petitioner sought an opportunity to explain the differential turnover and asserted that the disputed turnover related to non-taxable purchases. The record showed that no personal hearing had been granted before completing the assessments. In these circumstances, the absence of an opportunity to present supporting records and accounts amounted to a breach of the principles of natural justice.
Conclusion: The assessment proceedings were not sustainable in their present form and were directed to be treated as show cause notices, with a fresh assessment to be made after receiving objections and granting personal hearing. The petitioner obtained partial relief.