Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an assessee who had earlier been a non-resident, became a resident, and had invested foreign earnings in fixed deposits was entitled to the benefit under section 115H of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The Court noted that the assessee had brought foreign exchange into India, invested it in a bank fixed deposit, converted it into Indian rupees, and earned interest thereon. On the admitted facts, once the assessee filed the declaration required on becoming a resident, the amount invested in fixed deposit could not continue to be treated as an asset brought from abroad for the purpose of claiming the statutory benefit. The Tribunal was therefore right in holding that the assessee was not entitled to the relief claimed.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to the benefit under section 115H of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the question of law was answered against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where foreign earnings have been converted into Indian currency and invested after the assessee becomes a resident, the statutory benefit intended for assets brought from abroad cannot be claimed.