Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the melamine formaldehyde resin and phenolic formaldehyde resin manufactured by the appellant were classifiable under Chapter 39 or under Heading 3506, and consequently whether they were outside the negative list under Notification No. 50/2003-CE dated 10.06.2003.
Analysis: The classification dispute turned on whether the products were preparations specifically formulated for use as adhesives. The Tribunal followed its earlier decision on identical facts, noted that the investigation material was substantially the same, and accepted the reasoning that the products, being glue/adhesive preparations based on PF, UF and MF, fell outside Chapter 39 in view of the HSN explanatory notes and the clarificatory memorandum relied upon. The Tribunal also held that the departmental material did not displace the earlier view on classification.
Conclusion: The impugned goods were held to be the purview of Chapter 39 and therefore eligible for the claimed exemption. The appeal was allowed and the demand set aside.