Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after belated returns were accepted on payment of composition fee, the Assessing Officer could still invoke best judgment assessment and estimate suppressed purchases and sales without adequate material.
Analysis: The accepted belated returns were to be treated as the returns for the relevant assessment years for practical purposes. Once such returns had been accepted, the authority could not proceed on the footing that they remained unfiled or ignore them merely because they were filed after inspection. Best judgment assessment requires material support, and the cited principle was that where purchases and sales are alleged to be suppressed, only the excess sales not covered by purchases can be brought to tax. On the facts, the impugned assessment proceeded without such material support.
Conclusion: The best judgment assessments were not sustainable, and the assessment orders were liable to be interfered with.
Final Conclusion: The writ petitions succeeded, the assessment orders were set aside, and the matters were remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: Accepted belated returns cannot be disregarded for best judgment assessment, and any estimate of suppressed turnover must rest on material supporting the addition rather than on conjecture.