Banking company exempt from Section 115JA, interest under Section 234D allowed, income classification upheld.

The Tribunal held that Section 115JA does not apply to a banking company, dismissing the revenue's appeal. Regarding interest under Section 234D, the Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)'s decision and allowed the revenue's appeal. The classification of income from the sale of investments was upheld in favor of the assessee, dismissing the revenue's appeal. The final order resulted in the dismissal of certain appeals and the partial allowance of others.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Applicability of Section 115JA to a banking company.
2. Imposition of interest under Section 234D.
3. Classification of income from sale of investments as capital gains or business income.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Applicability of Section 115JA to a Banking Company:
The primary issue was whether the provisions of Section 115JA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which mandates companies to prepare a Profit & Loss account in accordance with Parts II and III of Schedule VI of the Companies Act, 1956, apply to a banking company. The assessee argued that as a scheduled bank, it was not required to prepare its Profit & Loss account under these provisions, thus Section 115JA was inapplicable. This argument was supported by several judicial pronouncements, including the ITAT Mumbai's decision in Krung Thai Bank PCL Vs. JCIT and the assessee's own case for AY 2000-01. The Tribunal upheld this view, stating that the provisions of Section 115JA are not applicable to the assessee, a banking company. Consequently, the revenue’s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee’s cross objections were partly allowed on legal grounds.

2. Imposition of Interest Under Section 234D:
The second issue revolved around the imposition of interest under Section 234D for AY 2002-03. The CIT(A) had held that interest under Section 234D could not be charged for AY 2002-03, relying on the decision in ITO Vs. Ekta Promoters Private Limited. However, the Tribunal noted that the original quantum assessment order was passed after the introduction of Section 234D, making the section applicable to the assessee. The Tribunal referred to the Bombay High Court's decision in CIT Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., which clarified that amendments to the Act apply to pending proceedings. Therefore, the Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)'s decision and allowed the revenue’s appeal, concluding that interest under Section 234D was correctly charged.

3. Classification of Income from Sale of Investments:
The third issue concerned whether the income from the sale of shares by the assessee bank should be treated as capital gains or business income for AY 2003-04. The revenue contended that all investments by banks should be treated as current assets, and profits from their sale should be classified as business income. However, the assessee argued that it had consistently classified its investments into current and permanent categories, treating the latter as capital assets. The CIT(A) agreed with the assessee, noting that the department had accepted this classification in earlier years. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)’s decision, emphasizing the consistency in the assessee's practice and the department's acceptance in previous years. Consequently, the revenue’s appeal was dismissed.

Conclusion:
- The Tribunal dismissed the revenue’s appeals regarding the applicability of Section 115JA and the classification of income from the sale of investments.
- The Tribunal allowed the revenue’s appeal concerning the imposition of interest under Section 234D.
- The cross objections by the assessee were dismissed as infructuous.

Final Order:
- ITA No. 8581/M/2010, ITA No. 910/M/2011 & CO No. 43/M/2013 were dismissed.
- CO No. 153/M/2012 was partly allowed.
- ITA No. 8582/M/2010 was allowed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 04th October, 2017.

---