MODVAT credit denied for delayed input receipt and lack of proof that suppliers had paid duty

MODVAT credit is not available where the assessee fails to prove compliance with statutory conditions for availing input credit. Credit of one set of challans was disallowed because the inputs were found not to have been received within the prescribed 180-day period, and the duplicate-reference objection did not cure that defect. Further credit was denied because no evidence was produced to show that the suppliers had paid duty on the inputs. The de novo findings were treated as supported by the record, leaving the disputed credit disallowance intact.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the denial of credit of Rs. 2,66,221/- could be sustained when the same challans were subjected to demand on overlapping grounds and the assessee failed to establish receipt of goods within the stipulated period; (ii) Whether the denial of credit of Rs. 1,41,890/- and Rs. 1,02,084/- was justified in the absence of evidence showing that the suppliers had paid duty on the inputs.

Issue (i): Whether the denial of credit of Rs. 2,66,221/- could be sustained when the same challans were subjected to demand on overlapping grounds and the assessee failed to establish receipt of goods within the stipulated period?

Analysis: The adjudicating authority had examined the matter in de novo proceedings and recorded that the inputs covered by the relevant challans were not received within 180 days as required by the applicable MODVAT scheme. It further found that the allegation of duplicate demand arose because the same set of challans had been referred to in more than one annexure, but the credit of Rs. 2,66,221/- remained properly disallowable under the statutory framework. The assessee did not produce material to dislodge the finding that the goods were not returned within the prescribed time.

Conclusion: The disallowance of credit of Rs. 2,66,221/- was upheld, in favour of Revenue.

Issue (ii): Whether the denial of credit of Rs. 1,41,890/- and Rs. 1,02,084/- was justified in the absence of evidence showing that the suppliers had paid duty on the inputs?

Analysis: The earlier remand had permitted the assessee to produce evidence of duty payment by the suppliers, but no such evidence was produced in the de novo proceedings. In the absence of proof that the inputs suffered duty, the adjudicating authority held that the credit could not be allowed, and that finding was found to be supported by the record.

Conclusion: The denial of credit of Rs. 1,41,890/- and Rs. 1,02,084/- was upheld, in favour of Revenue.

Final Conclusion: The appellate challenge failed in full and the order disallowing the disputed credit was sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessee fails to establish the statutory conditions for availing credit, including timely receipt of inputs and proof of duty paid nature of the goods, the credit can be disallowed and the appellate authority will not interfere with a reasoned de novo finding.

---