Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2017 (9) TMI 1227 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Rules in Favor of Assessee: Firm Dissolution Income Deletion Upheld The Tribunal concluded that the addition of Rs. 13,82,94,326 in the hands of the assessee was not justified as the dissolution of the firm was genuine and ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal Rules in Favor of Assessee: Firm Dissolution Income Deletion Upheld

                          The Tribunal concluded that the addition of Rs. 13,82,94,326 in the hands of the assessee was not justified as the dissolution of the firm was genuine and the income from the sale was rightly declared by M/s. Vascon Engineers Ltd. The Tribunal deleted the addition made in the hands of the assessee and allowed the appeal partly, emphasizing the principle that the substance of the transaction should prevail over the form, and due taxes had already been paid on the transaction by M/s. Vascon Engineers Ltd.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Validity of the order passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Income-tax Act.
                          2. Validity of assessment made in the name of the firm.
                          3. Requirement of incriminating material for assessment.
                          4. Violation of principles of natural justice.
                          5. Addition of Rs. 13,82,94,326 on account of income from alleged sale of land to M/s. Suzlon Energy Ltd.
                          6. Treatment of taxes paid by M/s. Vascon Engineers Ltd. as taxes paid by the appellant.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Validity of the order passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Income-tax Act:
                          This issue was not pressed by the assessee and hence dismissed as 'not pressed'.

                          2. Validity of assessment made in the name of the firm:
                          This issue was also not pressed by the assessee and hence dismissed as 'not pressed'.

                          3. Requirement of incriminating material for assessment:
                          This issue was not pressed by the assessee and hence dismissed as 'not pressed'.

                          4. Violation of principles of natural justice:
                          This issue was not pressed by the assessee and hence dismissed as 'not pressed'.

                          5. Addition of Rs. 13,82,94,326 on account of income from alleged sale of land to M/s. Suzlon Energy Ltd.:
                          The primary issue revolved around the addition of Rs. 13,82,94,326 on account of income from the alleged sale of land to M/s. Suzlon Energy Ltd. The assessee argued that the sale was recognized in the books of M/s. Vascon Engineers Ltd. after the firm was dissolved on 29-05-2007, and the possession was handed over on 29-06-2007. The Assessing Officer (AO) did not accept this explanation, noting that certain documents suggested the firm continued to exist after the dissolution date. The AO held that the dissolution and subsequent agreements were a colorable device to shift income to M/s. Vascon Engineers Ltd. for better valuation of shares. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's findings, rejecting the assessee's contentions and confirming the addition.

                          6. Treatment of taxes paid by M/s. Vascon Engineers Ltd. as taxes paid by the appellant:
                          The assessee argued that since M/s. Vascon Engineers Ltd. had declared the income from the sale and paid taxes on it, the same should be treated as taxes paid by the appellant. The Tribunal examined the facts and documents, including the dissolution deed, balance sheets, and agreements. It found that the dissolution was genuine and the income from the sale was rightly declared by M/s. Vascon Engineers Ltd. The Tribunal noted that the taxes had been paid at higher rates by M/s. Vascon Engineers Ltd., and there was no merit in disturbing the same.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal concluded that the addition of Rs. 13,82,94,326 in the hands of the assessee was not justified as the dissolution of the firm was genuine and the income from the sale was rightly declared by M/s. Vascon Engineers Ltd. The Tribunal deleted the addition made in the hands of the assessee and allowed the appeal partly. The judgment emphasized the principle that the substance of the transaction should prevail over the form, and due taxes had already been paid on the transaction by M/s. Vascon Engineers Ltd.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found