Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was required to make only a partial pre-deposit and whether the balance of the tax, interest and penalties could be waived during pendency of the appeal.
Analysis: The appeal arose from a demand treated as service tax under the head of Business Auxiliary Service on the basis that the appellant was promoting the business of its client and earning commission. The plea of exemption under Notification No. 06/2005 and the contention that the activity was in the nature of franchisee services were noted, but the classification dispute was left for final hearing. At the interim stage, the Tribunal formed a prima facie view that the appellant was engaged in business promotion and considered it appropriate to secure the matter by directing a limited deposit.
Conclusion: The appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 44,000 within four weeks, and on compliance the balance amount of service tax, interest and penalties was waived during the pendency of the appeal.