Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was leviable where the assessee had not offered the entire capital gain arising from the joint development arrangement and the question of taxability of the underlying transaction had already been answered against the assessee in the earlier proceedings.
Analysis: The issue was concluded by the earlier binding decision on the same transaction, which held that no capital gains could be brought to tax on unrealised amounts where the development agreement did not satisfy the requirements of section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and, consequently, section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 did not apply. Since the taxable capital gain itself did not arise on the unrealised portion, the foundation for penalty under section 271(1)(c) disappeared. The Revenue was unable to dislodge the applicability of that decision to the present facts.
Conclusion: The penalty was not exigible and the deletion of penalty was upheld in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where no capital gains accrue on unrealised consideration from an unregistered development arrangement that does not attract section 53A, penalty for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars under section 271(1)(c) cannot be sustained.