Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2017 (9) TMI 719 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal remands case for fresh assessment after admitting new evidence, directs proper hearing for assessee. The Tribunal admitted additional evidence and remanded the case to the Assessing Officer for a de-novo determination of all issues, considering newly ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal remands case for fresh assessment after admitting new evidence, directs proper hearing for assessee.

                            The Tribunal admitted additional evidence and remanded the case to the Assessing Officer for a de-novo determination of all issues, considering newly submitted agreements. The Assessing Officer is directed to provide the assessee with a proper hearing and adjudicate the matter in accordance with the law, allowing the appeal for statistical purposes.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Sustaining the Order of the Assessing Officer by relying on the Order passed by CIT(A) for A.Y. 2006-07.
                            2. Treating income from the sale of flats as arising from the business of property development.
                            3. Applicability of Section 50C and the adoption of Stamp Authorities' value.
                            4. Estimation of net profit at 12% on the value adopted by the Stamp Authorities.
                            5. Ignoring respective values of copies of three Agreements.
                            6. Taxing the entire income as "Income from Other Sources" and not giving any deduction for expenses.
                            7. Additional ground regarding the difference between opening and closing stock.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Sustaining the Order of the Assessing Officer by relying on the Order passed by CIT(A) for A.Y. 2006-07:
                            The assessee argued that the CIT(A) erred in sustaining the AO's order by relying on the previous order for A.Y. 2006-07 without proper application of mind. The Tribunal admitted the additional ground of appeal, considering it purely legal, in line with the Supreme Court's decision in National Thermal Power Corporation Limited v. CIT.

                            2. Treating income from the sale of flats as arising from the business of property development:
                            The AO treated the income from the sale of flats as business income, not as income from other sources. The assessee contended that they are property developers and thus, Section 50C should not apply. The Tribunal considered the additional evidence of sale agreements for Flat No. 7 and Flat No. 16, which were not previously available due to the death of the Managing Director and subsequent mismanagement.

                            3. Applicability of Section 50C and the adoption of Stamp Authorities' value:
                            The AO adopted the value determined by the Stamp Authorities (Rs. 14,11,000) instead of the agreement value (Rs. 6,96,000). The assessee argued that as developers, Section 50C should not apply. The Tribunal noted the additional evidence and directed the AO to re-examine the issue with the newly submitted agreements.

                            4. Estimation of net profit at 12% on the value adopted by the Stamp Authorities:
                            The AO estimated a net profit of 12% on the Stamp Authorities' value without rejecting the books of accounts. The Tribunal directed the AO to reconsider this estimation in light of the additional evidence provided by the assessee.

                            5. Ignoring respective values of copies of three Agreements:
                            The AO ignored the values of Flat No. 7, Flat No. 16, and Flat No. 306 due to the lack of agreements. The Tribunal admitted the additional evidence and remanded the case to the AO for a fresh evaluation of these agreements.

                            6. Taxing the entire income as "Income from Other Sources" and not giving any deduction for expenses:
                            The AO taxed the entire income of Rs. 1,95,000 as "Income from Other Sources" without allowing deductions for expenses. The Tribunal instructed the AO to reconsider this classification and the associated deductions based on the additional evidence.

                            7. Additional ground regarding the difference between opening and closing stock:
                            The assessee raised an additional ground regarding the non-deduction of the difference between opening and closing stock (Rs. 13,61,415) from total sales. The Tribunal admitted this ground and directed the AO to address it during the re-assessment.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal admitted the additional evidence and remanded the case to the AO for a de-novo determination of all issues on merits, considering the newly submitted agreements. The AO is instructed to provide the assessee with a proper hearing and to adjudicate the matter in accordance with the law. The appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found