TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court orders refund despite late filing, emphasizes timely consideration of zero-rated sales and Input Tax Credit claims.</h1> <h3>Abirami Engineering Company Versus The Assistant Commissioner (CT)</h3> Abirami Engineering Company Versus The Assistant Commissioner (CT) - TMI Issues:1. Reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) due to belated filing of Form-W.2. Rejection of refund request based on belated filing of Form-W.3. Legal implications of delay in filing Form-W for considering refund requests.Analysis:1. The petitioner challenged the proceedings directing the reversal of ITC amounting to Rs. 19,88,450 due to the belated filing of Form-W. The court noted that a previous order had established that delay in filing Form-W should not bar the consideration of refund requests for zero-rated sales. The court cited precedents where delay in filing did not justify rejection of refund claims, emphasizing the importance of Input Tax Credit provisions and timely filing of monthly returns for refund claims related to zero-rated sales.2. The court reiterated that the delay in submitting Form-W or using manual submission should not be grounds for refusing to review the petitioner's refund application. The respondent acknowledged that the issue was previously addressed in a similar case, indicating that the petitioner's claim would be reconsidered based on the earlier order favoring refund requests despite delays in Form-W submission.3. Considering the established legal principles and precedents, the court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned order that rejected the refund request due to belated Form-W filing. The court directed the respondent to reassess the petitioner's refund claim without considering the delay in Form-W submission and instructed the respondent to issue appropriate orders within eight weeks. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to legal provisions for refund claims related to zero-rated sales and Input Tax Credit, ensuring timely consideration of applications irrespective of minor procedural delays.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
