Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reimbursement-related credits of Rs. 13,21,53,000 and Rs. 5,44,13,490 could be brought to tax in the assessment year 2012-13, and whether the transfer-pricing mark-up of Rs. 21,76,540 was taxable.
Analysis: The assessee had originally debited the expenditure in the earlier assessment year but had voluntarily withdrawn the deduction claim in the revised computation and offered the amount to tax. The later credit to the profit and loss account arose pursuant to the cost reimbursement arrangement, and the amount represented only an accounting adjustment with no real income arising again in the relevant year. The Tribunal therefore accepted the assessee's contention that the reimbursement component could not be taxed twice merely because of the book entry. However, the agreed mark-up under the transfer-pricing arrangement represented income in the relevant year and retained its revenue character.
Conclusion: The additions relating to Rs. 13,21,53,000 and Rs. 5,44,13,490 were deleted, while the addition of Rs. 21,76,540 was sustained. The appeal was thus partly allowed.