TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal in the case with citation 2017 (9) TMI 95 - SC.</h1> The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal in the case with citation 2017 (9) TMI 95 - SC. - 2017 (51) S.T.R. J78 (SC) Cenvat Credit - Tribunal held that the respondent shall be deemed to be an output service provider under Rule 2(p) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and was therefore entitled to Cenvat credit for the Service Tax paid by it prior to the period 5-3-2004 - the decision in the case of Union of India Versus Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. [2015 (2) TMI 1112 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT] contested, where it was held that The Rules having come into force on 10-9-2004 only, and not having been made retrospective in operation, the Tribunal erred in holding that during the relevant period prior to 5-3-2004, the respondent would be deemed to be an output service provider under Rule 2(p) giving it retrospective effect - Held that: - the decision in the above case upheld - appeal dismissed - decided against Appellant. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal in the case with citation 2017 (9) TMI 95 - SC. Judges were Mr. Madan B. Lokur and Mr. Adarsh Kumar Goel.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
