Tribunal limits transfer pricing adjustment, upholds RPM method for ALP in international transactions

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal against a transfer pricing adjustment of ? 48,90,27,914, limiting the adjustment to international transactions only. The Tribunal upheld the use of Resale Price Method (RPM) for determining the arm's length price (ALP) and rejected including companies with different business models as comparables. The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer/TPO for redetermination, emphasizing adherence to precedent in the assessee's previous cases for determining ALP in international transactions.

---

---

Issues:
1. Transfer pricing adjustment amounting to Rs. 48,90,27,914.

Analysis:
1. The appeal was against a final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer regarding transfer pricing adjustment. The assessee, an Indian company, engaged in trading beauty products directly to customers. The controversy arose regarding the purchase of traded goods, and the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) determined an adjustment amounting to Rs. 48,90,27,914. The Dispute Resolution Panel and Assessing Officer upheld this adjustment, leading to the appeal.

2. The Tribunal noted that in the preceding years, the RPM was accepted as the most appropriate method for determining the arm's length price (ALP) for international transactions. The TPO had consistently chosen Modicare Ltd. as the sole comparable, which the Tribunal had approved. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of selecting comparables primarily engaged in direct sales with no significant value addition activities. The Tribunal's previous order was considered a precedent for the current case.

3. The contention to include companies selling similar products through a retail chain as comparables was rejected. The Tribunal highlighted that companies with different business models cannot be compared. The argument to switch to the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) was also dismissed, as the RPM was deemed appropriate due to the lack of value addition in the assessee's business model.

4. The Tribunal directed that the transfer pricing adjustment should be limited to international transactions only, following legal precedents. The adjustment based on non-associated enterprise transactions was deemed impermissible. The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer/TPO for redetermining the ALP of international transactions, giving the assessee an opportunity to be heard.

5. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, and the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, emphasizing adherence to the precedent set in the assessee's previous cases for determining the ALP of international transactions.

---