Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revision order passed under Section 84 of the Finance Act, 1994 was liable to be set aside for want of reasonable opportunity of hearing and breach of natural justice.
Analysis: The revision order was passed without granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing. This amounted to a violation of the principles of natural justice. The challenge based on the alleged survival of the original order after the appellate order was not finally decided and was left open on remand.
Conclusion: The impugned revision order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner for fresh after giving reasonable opportunity of hearing to the appellant.