Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the forfeiture of property under SAFEMA extinguishes the rights of bona fide tenants who are not relatives or associates of the detenu and whose tenancy is unconnected with the illegally acquired property.
Analysis: The Act is directed against illegally acquired property of the person to whom it applies and property traceable to such person, including property held by relatives or associates where the requisite nexus exists. The statutory scheme does not authorise forfeiture of independent rights of strangers to the detenu merely because the property owned by the detenu is forfeited. The governing principle is that forfeiture reaches only the detenu's interest and any property with the necessary link to the illegal acquisition. A bona fide tenant, if truly unconnected with the detenu's acquisition of the property, is not automatically divested of tenancy rights and such claim requires independent examination by the competent authority.
Conclusion: The rights of a bona fide tenant are not automatically terminated by forfeiture under SAFEMA, and the matter must be determined independently on the question of tenancy and nexus.
Ratio Decidendi: Forfeiture under SAFEMA extinguishes only the rights of the person to whom the Act applies and of persons whose interest has a proved nexus with the illegally acquired property; it does not, by itself, defeat the independent rights of a bona fide tenant unconnected with such acquisition.