Threshold for interfering with acquittal in false statement prosecutions: leave refused where proof, sanction, and mens rea were lacking.

Special leave against an acquittal under Section 181 IPC is to be granted only where the challenged order is shown to be unreasonable, perverse, or affected by legal infirmity. On the facts, the prosecution failed because the alleged false statement was not proved in the manner required, the oath-related procedure was not properly followed, the sanction for prosecution was not duly established, and the record did not show deliberate falsehood or mens rea. The acceptance of the assessee's explanation in parallel proceedings also supported the view that the complaint was unsustainable. Special leave to appeal was therefore rightly refused.

---

---

Issues: Whether special leave to appeal against the order of acquittal deserved to be granted in a prosecution under Section 181 of the Indian Penal Code.

Analysis: Leave against acquittal can be granted only where the order under challenge is shown to be unreasonable, perverse, or suffering from a legal infirmity. The trial court had recorded findings that the requirements for proving the alleged false statement were not satisfied, the oath-related procedure was not duly complied with, the sanction to prosecute was not properly proved, and the record did not establish deliberate falsehood or mens rea. The court also noted that the assessee's explanation regarding the alleged concealment had been accepted in parallel proceedings, which supported the view that the complaint was not sustainable.

Conclusion: Special leave to appeal was rightly refused.

---