Prima facie material and demand of illegal gratification govern charge-framing in corruption conspiracy cases

At the charge-framing stage, the court examines only whether the record discloses a prima facie case and does not undertake a detailed assessment of evidence. In conspiracy and corruption prosecutions, there must be material showing agreement and, for offences under Sections 7 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, proof of demand of illegal gratification. The intercepted calls, including the cited conversations, were found insufficient to link the respondent to the alleged raid, demand, or acceptance of bribe, and the Section 161 and 164 statements did not provide reliable support. On that basis, the High Court's quashing of the charge was justified.

---

---

Issues: Whether the order framing charge against the respondent for criminal conspiracy and offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act was liable to be quashed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for want of prima facie material.

Analysis: At the stage of framing charge, the court is required to examine only whether the record discloses a prima facie case and not to conduct a detailed evaluation of the evidence. In a prosecution for conspiracy and corruption, proof of agreement and, in the case of offences under Sections 7 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, proof of demand of illegal gratification are essential. The intercepted conversations relied upon by the prosecution were found insufficient to connect the respondent with the alleged raid or with any concluded demand or acceptance of illegal gratification. Call No. 48 did not implicate the respondent in the settlement of the alleged bribe, and Call No. 51 was held to be cryptic and ambiguous, with no clear nexus to the alleged conspiracy. The statements recorded under Sections 161 and 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 were also found not to furnish reliable support against the respondent.

Conclusion: The High Court was justified in quashing the charge as no prima facie material established the respondent's involvement in the alleged conspiracy or in any demand or acceptance of illegal gratification.

---