TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a 100% Export Oriented Unit clearing goods into the Domestic Tariff Area was entitled to the duty rate under Serial No. 3 of Notification No. 23/2003-CE, and whether denial of the benefit on the ground that no Cenvat credit had been availed on inputs justified the demand of differential duty, interest, and penalty.
Analysis: The applicable test under the exemption notification was whether the goods, if manufactured and cleared by a unit other than a 100% EOU, were wholly exempt from excise duty or chargeable to nil rate of duty. The decisive consideration was not whether the assessee had availed Cenvat credit on inputs, but whether the goods fell within the scope of a conditional exemption or a nil-rate exemption in the hands of a normal unit. The Tribunal followed its earlier view that the non-availment of Cenvat credit by a 100% EOU was not a relevant ground to deny the benefit of Serial No. 3, and that the goods were not wholly exempt merely because a conditional exemption existed under the relevant notification structure.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to clearance under Serial No. 3 of Notification No. 23/2003-CE read with Notification No. 29/2004-CE. The demand of differential duty, along with the consequential interest and penalty, was not sustainable.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed, with the assessee succeeding on the core question of duty liability.
Ratio Decidendi: For a 100% EOU, entitlement under the relevant exemption notification depends on the nature of the duty position applicable to a normal unit and not on whether Cenvat credit was actually availed on inputs; a conditional exemption does not by itself amount to a wholly exempt or nil-rate regime for denying the notified benefit.
TaxTMI 
