Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2017 (7) TMI 949 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal directs fresh assessment on AMP expenses & inventory write-off The Tribunal allowed both appeals filed by the assessee and the Revenue for statistical purposes, directing the AO/TPO to reconsider the issues afresh in ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal directs fresh assessment on AMP expenses & inventory write-off

                            The Tribunal allowed both appeals filed by the assessee and the Revenue for statistical purposes, directing the AO/TPO to reconsider the issues afresh in light of relevant judgments and providing the assessee an opportunity to present its case. The order emphasized the need for a thorough re-evaluation of the AMP expenses as an international transaction and the write-off of demonstration equipment inventory, ensuring compliance with legal precedents and proper documentation.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Determination of AMP expenses as an international transaction.
                            2. Disallowance of write-off of demonstration equipment inventory.
                            3. Disallowance of advertisement charges as deferred revenue expenditure.
                            4. Partial credit of tax deducted at source.
                            5. Initiation of penalty proceedings.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Determination of AMP Expenses as an International Transaction:
                            The primary issue was whether the Advertisement, Marketing, and Promotion (AMP) expenses incurred by the assessee constituted an international transaction. The TPO and DRP concluded that the assessee promoted Bose products and developed marketing intangibles for its AE, which required compensation. The AMP expenditure was treated as an international transaction under section 92B(1) read with clause (v) of section 92F. The TPO benchmarked the AMP expenses using comparables and determined an adjustment of Rs. 7,92,95,484/- along with a mark-up of 15.27%. However, the Tribunal referred to various judgments, including Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. and Whirlpool of India Ltd., which held that AMP expenses were not international transactions. The Tribunal decided to restore the matter to the TPO/AO for fresh determination in light of the judgments, providing an opportunity for the assessee to be heard.

                            2. Disallowance of Write-off of Demonstration Equipment Inventory:
                            The assessee challenged the disallowance of Rs. 45,61,318/- for the write-off of demonstration equipment inventory. The DRP upheld the AO's decision, stating that the assessee failed to prove the Net Realizable Value (NRV) was lower than the cost. The DRP noted that the NRV adopted by the assessee was significantly lower than the sale price and cost price of the equipment. The Tribunal, however, decided to provide the assessee an opportunity to produce documentary evidence to support its claim and directed the AO to decide afresh.

                            3. Disallowance of Advertisement Charges as Deferred Revenue Expenditure:
                            The AO disallowed Rs. 6,10,91,813/- (being 4/5th of the total expenditure) paid towards advertisement charges, treating it as deferred revenue expenditure. The assessee argued that the entire expenditure should be allowed as revenue expenditure in one year. The Tribunal noted that the AO's action resulted in double taxation since an addition had already been made on AMP expenditure by the TPO. The Tribunal restored the matter to the AO for fresh consideration.

                            4. Partial Credit of Tax Deducted at Source:
                            The assessee contended that the AO erred in giving only partial credit of tax deducted at source amounting to Rs. 12,78,043/- instead of Rs. 15,25,403/- as claimed in the return of income. The Tribunal directed the AO to verify and provide the correct credit for tax deducted at source.

                            5. Initiation of Penalty Proceedings:
                            The assessee challenged the initiation of penalty proceedings under sections 271(1)(c), 271BA, and 271AA of the Act. The Tribunal did not specifically address this issue in detail, as the main issues were restored to the AO/TPO for fresh determination.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal allowed both the appeals filed by the assessee and the Revenue for statistical purposes, directing the AO/TPO to reconsider the issues afresh in light of the judgments and providing the assessee an opportunity to present its case. The order emphasized the need for a thorough re-evaluation of the AMP expenses as an international transaction and the write-off of demonstration equipment inventory, ensuring compliance with legal precedents and proper documentation.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found