Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty imposed under Section 76 of the Finance Act was liable to be reduced from Rs. 37,800 to Rs. 1,200 on the footing that the delay in payment of service tax was only 12 days and that the higher figure resulted from a clerical error in recording the date of payment.
Analysis: The service tax liability related to the period April 2003 to September 2003. The record showed that the tax and interest had been paid, but the date of payment was inconsistently recorded as 6.11.03 and 6.11.04 in the reply and the subsequent orders. On examining the record, the later date was found to be a clerical mistake, and the delay was held to be only 12 days rather than one year and 12 days. The penalty had therefore been computed on an erroneous basis.
Conclusion: The penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act was reduced to Rs. 1,200, being Rs. 100 per day for 12 days' delay, and the appeal was allowed to that extent in favour of the assessee.