TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether the value of goods manufactured on job work basis had to be determined on the basis of the principal manufacturer's selling price or on the settled principle of landed cost of raw materials plus job charges; and (ii) whether machine rental charges for dispensing machines were includible in the assessable value of the syrup.
Issue (i): whether the value of goods manufactured on job work basis had to be determined on the basis of the principal manufacturer's selling price or on the settled principle of landed cost of raw materials plus job charges.
Analysis: The valuation of goods manufactured on job work basis was held to be governed by the settled principle laid down for job work clearances, under which the assessable value is determined with reference to the cost of raw materials supplied and the job charges. The Board's circular was also noted as consistent with that principle. The reliance placed on Notification No. 27/92-CE (NT) to adopt the principal manufacturer's selling price was found to be misconceived.
Conclusion: The value could not be determined on the basis of the principal manufacturer's selling price, and the assessee's job-work valuation was upheld.
Issue (ii): whether machine rental charges for dispensing machines were includible in the assessable value of the syrup.
Analysis: The inclusion of machine rental charges was examined in the light of the settled position that lease or rental charges for dispensing machines do not form part of the assessable value of the syrup. The earlier decision on the issue, as affirmed by the Supreme Court, was treated as conclusive.
Conclusion: Machine rental charges were not includible in the assessable value.
Final Conclusion: The demand and penalty sustained by the Commissioner (Appeals) were unsustainable, and the assessee obtained complete relief while the departmental challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: In job-work valuation, assessable value must be determined on the settled job-work principle and not on the principal manufacturer's selling price, and machine rental charges for dispensing machines are not part of the assessable value unless legally includible under the valuation scheme.
TaxTMI 
