Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether the assessee was entitled to deduction on account of trade discount; (ii) whether machine usage charges formed part of the assessable value of the product.
Issue (i): whether the assessee was entitled to deduction on account of trade discount.
Analysis: The Tribunal had found as a fact that there was no flow back or return of the trade discount. That finding showed that the discount was genuine and not a device to inflate value.
Conclusion: The deduction for trade discount was allowable and the finding on this issue was left undisturbed.
Issue (ii): whether machine usage charges formed part of the assessable value of the product.
Analysis: The vending machine was installed by the holding company, but ownership vested in the marketing company. The charges were payable to the marketing company and not to the holding company, so they were not part of the value of the goods.
Conclusion: Machine usage charges were not includable in the assessable value.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on both valuation questions and the departmental appeals were dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Genuine trade discount without flow back is deductible, and charges not payable to the assessee and not forming part of the price of the goods are not includable in assessable value.