Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Rule 15 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was sustainable where the wrongly availed Cenvat credit had been reversed before issuance of the show-cause notice and interest had also been paid.
Analysis: The wrongly availed credit on outward GTA services, input services, credit without receipt of raw material, and the small amount relating to die cost was reversed before the show-cause notice. Interest was subsequently paid in compliance with the Tribunal's direction. The Revenue did not produce material to show any intention to evade duty. In the absence of such intent, the penal provision was not attracted.
Conclusion: Penalty was not justified and was set aside.