Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 52/2003-Cus. dated 31-3-2003 on the basis of approval granted by the Board of Approval for the imported goods used in production of export goods.
Analysis: The notification contained a specific entry for goods required in relation to production of export goods, and the appellant had obtained approval from the Board of Approval, which had examined the application and accepted the goods for the stated purpose. The Revenue did not dislodge that approval by any scientific test or expert evidence showing that the goods were not conducive to the production process or were irrelevant to it. In these circumstances, the Tribunal treated the Board's approval as sufficient for extending the notification benefit.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to the benefit of the notification and the denial of exemption was not sustainable.