Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deduction of freight was admissible under the valuation rules where transportation charges were shown separately in the invoice on the basis of approximate freight and duty had been paid on any excess recovery over actual freight.
Analysis: Rule 5 permits deduction of the cost of transportation where such charges are shown separately. The decisive requirement is that the transportation element is separately indicated and represents the amount recovered from the buyer towards freight; there is no further requirement that only a contemporaneously exact freight figure must be shown in the invoice. Once freight is separately charged and the price is not inclusive of freight, the deduction is not barred merely because the amount is an estimated or averaged figure. The departmental circular also did not specifically prohibit deduction in such a situation.
Conclusion: Deduction of freight could not be denied, and duty was not demandable on the entire freight amount; the finding was in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where transportation charges are shown separately and the amount recovered is the freight element actually charged from the buyer, deduction cannot be refused merely because the freight is estimated rather than exactly computed at the time of clearance.