Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether imported synthetic strips in running length, described as trim cutting synthetic waste, were classifiable under Heading 6310 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 12/2012-Customs dated 17.3.2012.
Analysis: The goods were found on examination to be synthetic strips in running length with a width of about 2.5 to 4 inches. The tariff entry under Heading 6310 covers used or new rags and other textile waste, and the goods arose as trimming waste at the end of manufacture of non-woven fabric rolls. The circular issued by CBEC clarified that trim cutting waste or fibre trim of continuous length with width up to 10 inches, used for manufacture of chindi rugs, would fall under Heading 6310 and could be cleared without import licence. On these facts, the imported goods were treated as waste suitable for rug manufacture and not as fabric under Heading 5603.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classified under Heading 6310 and the benefit consistent with that classification was available; the Revenue's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The classification adopted by the appellate authority was sustained, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Textile trim waste of continuous length, when identifiable as waste generated from manufacture and meant for rug-making, is classifiable as textile waste under Heading 6310 rather than as fabric under a separate heading.