Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether construction undertaken by a developer on its own land pursuant to an allotment arrangement and receipt of consideration constituted a works contract liable to tax.
Analysis: The existence of a works contract does not depend on whether the developer owns the land. If, before completion of construction, an arrangement is entered into for construction for valuable consideration and money is received pursuant to that arrangement, the transaction falls within the expanded meaning of works contract under Article 366(29-A)(b) of the Constitution of India. In such a composite transaction, the transfer of property in goods used in construction is taxable even though the ultimate subject matter involves immovable property. On the admitted facts, the arrangement for construction and receipt of funds established the necessary ingredients of a works contract.
Conclusion: The construction work was rightly treated as a works contract, and the answer to the first question is against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A pre-completion construction agreement entered into for valuable consideration, even by the owner-developer, constitutes a works contract and permits levy on the value of goods involved in execution.