Tribunal initiates insolvency resolution process for operational creditor against defaulter

The Tribunal initiated the insolvency resolution process under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, in favor of the petitioner, an Operational Creditor, against the respondent for defaulting on payments related to completed projects. The petitioner successfully demonstrated operational debt through evidence of completed work orders and dishonored cheques. The Tribunal appointed an interim resolution professional, imposed a moratorium on the Corporate Debtor, and outlined duties for the professional to ensure a successful resolution process.

---

---

Issues:
- Triggering insolvency resolution process under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
- Determining operational debt owed by the respondent.
- Analysis of the period of limitation for the claim.
- Compliance with the requirements of Section 9(3) of the Code.
- Appointment of an interim resolution professional.
- Imposition of a moratorium on the Corporate Debtor.
- Duties and responsibilities of the insolvency resolution professional.

Issue 1: Triggering Insolvency Resolution Process:
The petitioner sought to initiate insolvency proceedings against the respondent, claiming to be an 'Operational Creditor' under the Code. The respondent was alleged to have defaulted in making payments for completed projects, leading to the demand for insolvency resolution.

Issue 2: Determining Operational Debt:
The petitioner had completed various projects for the respondent, and post-dated cheques were issued for settlement. However, most cheques were dishonored, indicating a default in payment. The petitioner provided evidence of completed work orders and dishonored cheques to support the claim of operational debt.

Issue 3: Analysis of Period of Limitation:
The petitioner argued that the claim was within the limitation period, citing the issuance of post-dated cheques and subsequent dishonor as events that extended the limitation period. Legal precedents were referenced to support this argument, emphasizing the acknowledgment of liability through the issuance of cheques.

Issue 4: Compliance with Section 9(3) Requirements:
The Tribunal assessed the fulfillment of Section 9(3) obligations, which required specific documents to be submitted along with the petition. The petitioner provided invoices, affidavits, and financial institution certificates, demonstrating compliance with the statutory requirements.

Issue 5: Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional:
In the absence of a named interim resolution professional, the Tribunal appointed a qualified individual to oversee the insolvency resolution process. The professional was tasked with initiating necessary steps, including imposing a moratorium on the Corporate Debtor to protect its assets during the resolution process.

Issue 6: Imposition of Moratorium:
A moratorium was declared to prevent legal actions against the Corporate Debtor, ensuring the smooth progress of insolvency resolution. Essential goods and services supply to the Corporate Debtor was safeguarded during this period, with specific provisions outlined to guide the resolution process.

Issue 7: Duties of the Insolvency Resolution Professional:
The appointed professional was mandated to perform duties as per the relevant sections of the Code, including submitting reports within specified timelines. Cooperation from the Corporate Debtor's personnel, including promoters, was expected to facilitate the resolution process effectively.

In conclusion, the Tribunal found merit in the petitioner's claims and initiated the insolvency resolution process, appointing an interim resolution professional to oversee the proceedings diligently. The decision encompassed legal compliance, protection of assets through a moratorium, and the efficient execution of resolution duties by the professional to achieve a successful resolution of the operational debt issue.

---