TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court overturns ITAT decision on section 153C satisfaction</h1> <h3>Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax Versus Satkar Fincap Ltd.</h3> Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax Versus Satkar Fincap Ltd. - [2017] 393 ITR 378 Issues:1. Interpretation of section 153C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding the satisfaction recorded by the Assessing Officer.Analysis:The judgment in question pertains to the interpretation of section 153C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, specifically focusing on the satisfaction recorded by the Assessing Officer. The case involved search and seizure proceedings at the premises of certain entities, including M/s. Madhusudan Buildcon P. Ltd. During the search, relevant materials were seized. The Assessing Officer of the searched parties also happened to be the Assessing Officer of the present assessee. The Assessing Officer recorded a satisfaction note on September 8, 2010, regarding the applicability of section 153C to the case of M/s. Satkar Fincap Ltd.Subsequently, a section 153C notice was issued to the assessee on the same day, leading to the conclusion of assessment on December 31, 2010. The assessee's appeal was initially rejected, but the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) later overturned the decision, citing improper recording of satisfaction by the Assessing Officer as the grounds for quashing the assessment order.Upon review, the High Court found that the ITAT's conclusion was not sustainable, emphasizing the clear statement in the note provided by the Assessing Officer during the search and seizure process. The court noted that the documents seized during the search were linked to M/s. Satkar Fincap Ltd., justifying the invocation of section 153C. Consequently, the court set aside the ITAT's findings on the lack of satisfaction under section 153C and remitted the appeals for reconsideration on the merits by the ITAT. The court ensured that all rights and contentions of the parties remained open, clarifying that the judgment did not serve as a binding expression on the case's merits.In conclusion, the appeals were allowed, and the matter was remitted to the ITAT for a fresh consideration based on the clarified interpretation of the satisfaction recorded under section 153C of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
TaxTMI 