Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether credit taken on duty-paid inputs can be denied merely because the value of such inputs was written off in the books as material loss, bought-out rejection or scrap, when the inputs had been issued for manufacture and were rejected or damaged during the course of the manufacturing process.
Analysis: Credit on duty-paid inputs is admissible when the inputs are used for the intended manufacturing purpose. If, during the course of manufacture, some inputs get damaged, rejected or become scrap, such subsequent loss does not by itself establish that the inputs were cleared as such or that the credit was wrongly availed. The accounting entry of writing off the value of such inputs, by itself, is not conclusive proof of non-use. On the facts, the records and product non-conformity notes showed that the items were generated and rejected in the manufacturing area during processing, which is consistent with line rejections and scrap arising in manufacture.
Conclusion: Denial of credit was not justified; the credit on the disputed inputs could not be reversed merely because their value was written off after rejection or damage during manufacture.
Ratio Decidendi: Credit on duty-paid inputs cannot be denied solely on the basis of book write-off if the inputs were issued for manufacture and were rejected, damaged or scrapped during the manufacturing process.