Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit availed on inputs issued for manufacture of watches was required to be reversed when such inputs were rejected in the course of production and sold as scrap on payment of duty.
Analysis: The inputs had been issued for manufacture and were actually used in the production process. They were later found unsuitable for assembly of quality watches and were therefore rejected. The rejected components were treated as scrap and cleared on payment of applicable duty. The statutory scheme did not require reversal of Modvat credit merely because the inputs, after being issued for manufacture, became scrap due to rejection in the manufacturing process.
Conclusion: The demand for reversal of credit was not sustainable and the assessee succeeded on this issue.
Ratio Decidendi: Inputs issued for manufacture, if rejected in the course of the manufacturing process and treated as scrap, do not attract reversal of Modvat credit in the absence of a specific statutory requirement.