Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the learned Tribunal erred in directing restoration of the dealer's registration certificates cancelled for non-filing of returns.
Analysis: The registration was cancelled under Section 27(5)(g) of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 for non-filing of returns for three consecutive periods. The default was subsequently made good by filing the returns, paying the tax with interest, and paying the penalty. The original cancellation was based only on that default, and no other adverse allegation such as evasion was shown. The first appellate authority declined restoration on grounds outside the basis of the cancellation order, which were not the subject matter of the proceedings. In these circumstances, the Tribunal's view that restoration should follow did not suffer from any legal error warranting interference.
Conclusion: The Tribunal's direction to restore the registrations was upheld and the challenge by the State failed.