Restoration of appeal and pre-deposit compliance upheld where complete justice warranted intervention

The Commissioner (Appeals) was found to have failed to exercise the jurisdiction vested in him when refusing to restore the appeal, and the Tribunal held that the power to do complete justice could be invoked in the circumstances. It further stated that the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is not excluded from appellate proceedings under the Central Excise and Service Tax regime except to the extent specifically modified, and that the amount deposited was sufficient to satisfy the pre-deposit requirement. The refusal to restore the appeal was set aside, the matter was remanded for hearing on merits and a reasoned order, and the pre-deposit objection was treated as satisfied.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Commissioner (Appeals) was justified in refusing to restore the appeal and whether the pre-deposit requirement stood satisfied.

Analysis: The Tribunal held that the Commissioner (Appeals) failed to exercise the jurisdiction vested in him and that the power to do complete justice could be invoked in the circumstances. It further noted that the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was not excluded from appellate proceedings under the Central Excise and Service Tax regime except to the extent specifically modified, and that the amount deposited was sufficient to meet the pre-deposit requirement.

Conclusion: The refusal to restore the appeal was set aside, the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for hearing on merits and a reasoned order, and the pre-deposit objection was treated as satisfied.

---