Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 13-A(4) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 was justified when the assessee produced documents and books of account shortly after interception of the vehicle, and the only adverse circumstance was an error in describing the vehicle as a truck instead of a tractor trolley.
Analysis: Penalty under section 13-A(4) can be imposed only if, after considering the dealer's explanation, the authority is satisfied that the goods were omitted from the account registers or other business documents. The assessee produced Form 9, gate pass, transit permit, bilty, purchase and sale register, and books of account showing that the transaction was duly recorded. The adverse finding rested mainly on the description of the vehicle in the bilty. The vehicle number matched, the format used by the transporter printed the vehicle as truck, and the discrepancy was treated as a possible clerical omission. On the materials produced, the transaction could not be said to be unaccounted for, and the statutory requirement for imposing penalty was not met.
Conclusion: Penalty was not justified and the revision was answered in favour of the assessee.