Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund of unutilized Cenvat credit was admissible under Rule 5 in respect of credit attributable only to inputs actually used in the manufacture of exported goods.
Analysis: The refund under Rule 5 is confined to credit relatable to inputs used in the production of goods exported during the relevant period. Credit lying in the balance may also include amounts attributable to stock inputs, work-in-process, finished goods, or bought-out items, and such amounts cannot be treated as refundable merely because they remain unutilized. Since the original authority had already segregated and sanctioned only the credit attributable to exported goods, the lower appellate view was found to be correct.
Conclusion: The refund claim beyond the credit attributable to exported goods was not admissible and the Revenue's view was upheld.