Unutilised Cenvat credit refund allowed where accumulated input credit could not be adjusted against exports.

Refund of accumulated Cenvat credit was held admissible under Rule 5 where credit remained unutilised during the relevant period and could not be adjusted against clearances. The Tribunal treated Rule 5 as enabling refund of credit that cannot be set off, and rejected the view that mere availability of future utilisation defeats the claim. On that basis, the refund rejection was unsustainable and consequential relief followed.

---

---

Issues: Whether refund of accumulated Cenvat credit under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 was admissible where the credit remained unutilised for the relevant month.

Analysis: The refund claims arose from accumulated credit on inputs used in manufacture of exported processed fabrics. The authorities had rejected the claims on the premise that the conditions of Rule 5 were not satisfied and that refund was not available when credit could have been utilised. The Tribunal treated the provision as enabling refund of credit that could not be adjusted, and held that the relevant test was non-utilisation of credit for the exported goods. It accepted that the credit lying at the end of the month on account of non-utilisation could not be carried forward to defeat the refund claim.

Conclusion: Refund under Rule 5 read with Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 was admissible and the rejection of the refund claims was unsustainable.

Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded in establishing entitlement to refund of the accumulated unutilised credit, and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief.

Ratio Decidendi: Refund of accumulated Cenvat credit cannot be denied where the credit remains unutilised for the relevant period and the rule permits refund of credit that cannot be adjusted for any reason.

---