1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Review petition dismissed due to delay of 492 days; no merit found upon review.</h1> The Supreme Court dismissed the review petition due to a delay of 492 days in filing it and found no merit in the petition upon review. The review ... Maintainability of review petition - condonation of delay - the interlocutory application was filed eleven months after the judgment in the civil appeal - the decision in the case of Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai-I Versus M/s. Seiko Brushware India [2015 (9) TMI 458 - SUPREME COURT] sought to be reviewed - Held that: - when interlocutory application was filed first and thereafter the review, delay because of that reason could have been condoned. However,in present case, even the interlocutory application was filed eleven months after the judgment in the civil appeal. Therefore, there is no valid justification for condoning the delay - delay on condoned - review petition dismissed. The Supreme Court dismissed the review petition due to a delay of 492 days in filing it and found no merit in the petition upon review. The review petition was filed after an interlocutory application, which itself was filed eleven months after the judgment in the civil appeal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
